これを行うためのさまざまな方法と、いくつかのベンチマークを以下に示します。最良の方法は、他のライブラリの最適化されたコードを使用するバージョンです。このbottleneck.move_mean方法は、おそらくすべての面で最良です。このscipy.convolveアプローチはまた、非常に高速で拡張可能であり、構文的にも概念的にも単純ですが、非常に大きなウィンドウ値に対しては適切にスケーリングされません。numpy.cumsum純粋な方法が必要な場合は、この方法が適していますnumpyアプローチ。
注：これらの一部（例：）bottleneck.move_meanは中央に配置されておらず、データがシフトされます。
import numpy as np
import scipy as sci
import scipy.signal as sig
import pandas as pd
import bottleneck as bn
import time as time
def rollavg_direct(a,n):
'Direct "for" loop'
assert n%2==1
b = a*0.0
for i in range(len(a)) :
b[i]=a[max(i-n//2,0):min(i+n//2+1,len(a))].mean()
return b
def rollavg_comprehension(a,n):
'List comprehension'
assert n%2==1
r,N = int(n/2),len(a)
return np.array([a[max(i-r,0):min(i+r+1,N)].mean() for i in range(N)])
def rollavg_convolve(a,n):
'scipy.convolve'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float')/n, 'same')[n//2:-n//2+1]
def rollavg_convolve_edges(a,n):
'scipy.convolve, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float'), 'same')/sci.convolve(np.ones(len(a)),np.ones(n), 'same')
def rollavg_cumsum(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum'
assert n%2==1
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(a, 0, 0))
return (cumsum_vec[n:] - cumsum_vec[:-n]) / n
def rollavg_cumsum_edges(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(np.pad(a,(n-1,n-1),'constant'), 0, 0))
d = np.hstack((np.arange(n//2+1,n),np.ones(N-n)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (cumsum_vec[n+n//2:-n//2+1] - cumsum_vec[n//2:-n-n//2]) / d
def rollavg_roll(a,n):
'Numpy array rolling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
rolling_idx = np.mod((N-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(N), N)
return a[rolling_idx].mean(axis=0)[n-1:]
def rollavg_roll_edges(a,n):
# see /programming/42101082/fast-numpy-roll
'Numpy array rolling, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
a = np.pad(a,(0,n-1-n//2), 'constant')*np.ones(n)[:,None]
m = a.shape[1]
idx = np.mod((m-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(m), m) # Rolling index
out = a[np.arange(-n//2,n//2)[:,None], idx]
d = np.hstack((np.arange(1,n),np.ones(m-2*n+1+n//2)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (out.sum(axis=0)/d)[n//2:]
def rollavg_pandas(a,n):
'Pandas rolling average'
return pd.DataFrame(a).rolling(n, center=True, min_periods=1).mean().to_numpy()
def rollavg_bottlneck(a,n):
'bottleneck.move_mean'
return bn.move_mean(a, window=n, min_count=1)
N = 10**6
a = np.random.rand(N)
functions = [rollavg_direct, rollavg_comprehension, rollavg_convolve,
rollavg_convolve_edges, rollavg_cumsum, rollavg_cumsum_edges,
rollavg_pandas, rollavg_bottlneck, rollavg_roll, rollavg_roll_edges]
print('Small window (n=3)')
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[0:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,1001)
print('\nMemory\n')
print('Small window (n=3)')
N = 10**7
a = np.random.rand(N)
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions[2:] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[2:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,1001)
タイミング、小ウィンドウ（n = 3）
Direct "for" loop :
4.14 s ± 23.7 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
3.96 s ± 27.9 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
1.07 ms ± 26.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
4.68 ms ± 9.69 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.31 ms ± 5.11 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.52 ms ± 11.1 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.85 ms ± 9.63 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.3 ms ± 12.2 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Numpy array rolling :
31.3 ms ± 91.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
61.1 ms ± 55.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
タイミング、大きなウィンドウ（n = 1001）
Direct "for" loop :
4.67 s ± 34 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
4.46 s ± 14.6 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
103 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
272 ms ± 1.23 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.19 ms ± 12.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.7 ms ± 11.5 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.67 ms ± 199 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.31 ms ± 15.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
メモリ、小さなウィンドウ（n = 3）
The memory_profiler extension is already loaded. To reload it, use:
%reload_ext memory_profiler
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 362.66 MiB, increment: 73.61 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 510.24 MiB, increment: 221.19 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 441.81 MiB, increment: 152.76 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 518.14 MiB, increment: 228.84 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 449.34 MiB, increment: 160.02 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.17 MiB, increment: 75.54 MiB
Numpy array rolling :
peak memory: 661.29 MiB, increment: 362.65 MiB
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
peak memory: 1111.25 MiB, increment: 812.61 MiB
メモリ、大きなウィンドウ（n = 1001）
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 370.62 MiB, increment: 71.83 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 521.98 MiB, increment: 223.18 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 451.32 MiB, increment: 152.52 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 527.51 MiB, increment: 228.71 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 451.25 MiB, increment: 152.50 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.64 MiB, increment: 75.85 MiB